Thread: The Holy Grail?
View Single Post
Old Jul 19, 2006, 11:56 AM   #6
E.T
Senior Member
 
E.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 921
Default

VinnyP! wrote:
Quote:
The FX01 looked ideal, but why no PASM, no optical viewfinder and poor high ISO. I'd live¬*with the ISO grain¬*because of IS but not¬*no PASM hopefully they will bring out a¬*model more aimed at enthusiasts¬*
I don't see that happening because enthusiasts won't use small pocket P&S as main camera.


VinnyP! wrote:
Quote:
What happened with the Leica C-Lux 1. Leica high end camera manufacturer takes the FX01 and adds £100 if for that money they had added PASM they would have my money in the coffers already. But they have added nothing AFAICS?
That's how most digicam updates are done, by changing name/increasing number instead of real features.
E.T is offline   Reply With Quote