View Single Post
Old Jan 1, 2007, 9:19 AM   #9
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,564
Default

davepw wrote:
Quote:
One lingering question in my mind is to go with a Canon 17-40L instead of the Tamron...benefits would be build quality, usable on FF camera, and faster focusing. But I would sacrifice some reach, low light shooting, and pay an extra $20.

As always, I'd appreciate any input or suggestions...

PS. This thread is for shorter distance general purpose only -- I have a Canon 85mm f/1.8 and may get other primes (50mm f/1.8 or f/1.4) to cover indoor sports. I will get longer zoom(s) for outdoor sports.
It sounds like you need more coverage than f/2.8...

With your pick there's too much of an overlap between the 28~50mm range. Another option is an EX series, the only one really full-frame Super Wide zoom with HSM (faster focusing and full-time manual overide) which'll work quite well when you upgrade (at least for me):



NHL is offline   Reply With Quote