View Single Post
Old Jan 6, 2007, 4:24 PM   #1
alvevind
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 4
Default

Astro photographers have long been using webcams etc. in conjunction with programs like Registax to capture highly detailed images of planets etc. For those of you not familiar with Registax, look at this link, and observe the difference in detail in the first (real) image and the last (aggregated / multi sampled) image: http://www.threebuttes.com/RegistaxTutorial.htm

The basic principle of multi sampling (or stacking or whatever the correct term might be) is that multiple images of the same exact subject taken at slightly different times or from slightly different viewpoints actually are not precisely identical. If you have a large number of such "near identical" images (say 100) you in fact have more detail available than any single one of these images contain by itself. By combining these images in Registax (or similar software) you can obtain a significantly more detailed image. (And as a bonus you get heavy lossless noise reduction.)

Then to my actual question:

Can this multi sampling technique be applied to regular (non astronomical) high resolution telephoto to enhance detail in photos?

Obviously the subject would need to be completely motionless (i.e. no animal photography). To simplify debate let's stick to one single example: You the photographer are standing on the ocean shore. A mile out in the ocean is a solid rock with an old lighthouse. You want to produce as detailed a photo of that lighthouse as is possible.

... To make the scenario more interesting lets say you've entered a competition where a crazy billionaire has invited the worlds foremost photographers to his mansion overlooking the shore. He is offering 100 million dollars to the first photographer able to read the text written on a sign posted on the lighthouse. The photographers are not allowed to step outside the mansion, and can not bring their own equipment. Each photographer is given an identical setup with a super stable tripod, a state of the art DSLR camera, and a cheap (!) 300mm telephoto lens (so obviously the lens is the limiting factor not the sensor), and a computer with any desired software installed. You each have 24 hours to your disposal. You step onto the balcony and mount the camera on the tripod. Zooming in on the lighthouse you easily spot the sign. It is a modern white sign with black lettering. You take lots of RAW pictures using various apertures, load them onto the computer, select the sharpest ones, and run various kinds of channel splitting and sharpening using your favourite post processing tool. After post processing you can almost read the blurred (certainly not jagged) letters, but only almost. The rules are that each photographer will get one single chance to recite the sign, and it must be correct by the letter, otherwice they are escorted out of the mansion straight away.
Can you win the 100 million dollars using multi sampling (or some other fancy trick)?

Any experience/testing you (or others) might have using multi sampling for terrestial purposes would be very interesting to hear about. As would explanations or theories concerning the inevitable limiting physical factors at play.

What other techniques might be available for enhancing (midtone) details beyond what is available through normal post processing?

alvevind is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links