70-200 F/4 Vs 70-300 IS
Sorry to bring the same topic. I am a PhD student and not rolling on cash. I recently upgraded from S2IS to 40D and have tamron 17-50 F2.8 and 50 F1.8. Need a telephoto lens within 500-600 Euro (when u buy in Europe if not more expensive!). I don't want to regrate later and updrade. I prefer shooting low light scenes of cities (not indoor sports or fast action). But I can use the tamron for the same! The telephoto I sometimes might use for wildlife (I know 100-400 L is great but out of budget!) as well as normal travelling around. Will I regrate buying 70-200 instead of 70-300 IS? 70-200 I can sill use the same filters, advanntage. No plan to be a pro.
Any kind response will be appreciated!