Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 27, 2004, 9:52 AM   #1
Junior Member
al_gore's Avatar
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 8

I own a HP Photosmart 812.
I am very unhappy with the quality of photos it takes.
I would like to upgrade.
I can spend $400.00, maybe a little more.

I have shopped in the past with this notion in mind:
The larger the megapixel, the better the camera.

I am now under the impression that the larger the megapixels are, the larger the printed photo can be, NOT the better the image will be.
A 4 megapixel camera does not neccessarily take better quality pictures than a 2 or 3 megapixel camera.

I do not need to print large photos.
The largest photo I will EVER print is 8 x 11.
And I will do that rarely.
Mostly I view the images on-screen.

I need a camera that takes crystal clear, crisp, sharp images of interior shot portraiture.
Color accuracy and focus is important to me.

I don't care about video clips.
I don't care about printing a photo that can be used as a billboard.

So, I've come to the conclusion that I'm way off base shopping for a camera with the size of the megapixel as my criteria.
I need to find a camera with a good LENS.
I haven't a clue on how to do that.

I'm considering the Sony CD500 with a Carl Zeiss lens.

Does anyone have a better suggestion?

thank you
al_gore is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 29, 2004, 12:50 AM   #2
Senior Member
dnas's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 477

I lean towards the lens rather than JUST Mpixel size....

e.g. If you take some shots of someone (say a singer)on stage from 30 metres away, and you have 2Mpixel with 8x optical zoom, and an 8Mpixel with 4x optical zoom(both zoomed to maximum), the image of the singer(the singer cropped toyour satisfaction)will be be exactly the same with either camera.

So the 2Mpixel camera will provide the same resolution of the SUBJECT as the 8Mpixel camera.

(If you want to take a wide angle shot of everything, then the 8M will be superior of course)

So, I think that you should look at the lens first, then the Mpixels.

Look at www.dcresource.com

It has some good, critical reviews to help you choose.

dnas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 4, 2004, 2:34 AM   #3
Senior Member
TC3's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,169

I went from a 3m Sony to the 4m kyocera 410R. With the 10 x zoom and the extra res i am more then happy as nothing beats being able to see exactly what you are shooting and framing the subject right.....cropping on pc doesnt given me the same satisfaction. The EVF gains up and the 3,000,000 pixels makes it a pleasure to use.

I do not print larger then A4 but can do so no problem if required. The Kyocera has an excellent flash for portraits and pictures are sharp and skin tones come out perfect. I have been into photography over 20 years...so hopefully my opinion counts for something. the camera lacks manual focus but this is overcome by using spot focus in most cases.

style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #000000"Forget the fancy 8m res....they are over rated and to expensive and from what you say you dont need one

TC3 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:34 AM.