|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 36
|
![]()
I wanted to share some photos with everyone that i took with the Raynox DCR-250 Super Macro Conversion Lens. I am using Canon S1 IS camera, I am new to photography that is why I decided to try this lense. It was purchased at http://www.bhphotovideo.comwith 3 day UPS it cost me $55
Here are the samples. |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10
|
![]()
Great pictures! Just have been looking at this lens and a wide angle (6600pro) & telephoto (1850pro). Would be nice to have one of each, but trying to decide which to buy first. Looks like the macro lens would be a good choice.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,707
|
![]()
Selim wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10
|
![]()
Yes, in fact the 2020 is my first choice, but I haven't justified the cost or size difference quite yet. It seems a bit bigger than the 6600.
I think all of the Raynox DCR series will fit my camera (Canon S1 IS) with the 52mm lens adaptor. I hope I'm not mistaken about this... With so many choices it's easy to get lost in lens options! But I've read all good things about Raynox. I think they're a good bet. Wondering if there are any other quality lens manufacturers out there in the same price range. It's certainly nice to have options! And one more thing... I can't seem to understand the differences between how a telephoto lens and macro lens can BOTH take great 'macro' shots. :?: I'm guessing the difference lies in the distance (depth of field) from the object you are shooting? So a shot of a penny would be taken with a macro lens (DCR-250) and a picture of a rattlesnake at 15 feet with the telephoto lens (2020)? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|