Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > Add-On Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 16, 2004, 12:03 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 47
Default Sigma 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 lense

Does anybody have any knowledge or information regarding the Sigma 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 Compact Hyper Zoom Aspherical lense?

I am thinking of purchasing it 2nd hand for landscape, nature (animals) and possibly some outside sports shots. It will be my first add on lense (still getting to grips with add-on lenses with DSLR's ) apart from the Canon 18-55mm that came with my Digi Rebel as I need something with a lot more focal length for distance shots.

Anyone use one or come across one that you might be able to share some info on. Things like lense quality, what I can expect from it coupled with my Rebel.

Thanks for any help you can give.
Maff is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Apr 18, 2004, 9:06 AM   #2
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 47
Default

Anyone got any comments on this lense???
Maff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2004, 9:13 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
Default

There are two resources that I usually use when evaluating a lens. One is this on:
http://www.photozone.de/bindex2.html

(If that doesn't work, click on the "equipment" tab at the top.)
It lists that lens as the worst optically of all the XX-300 lense they have info about. It's optically .44 out of 5... its only redeeming factor seems to be a built quality of "not so good" (**- out of ****)

The other is this one:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/

This one is mixed. One person loved it (5/5) the other two dislike it (2/5 each.) One of them ending with:
Quote:
Don't EVER think of getting this as your first lens or only lens. But if you have a well rounded kit of good lenses,. then something like this may be of interest for certain situations where quality takes a far backseat to ultra portabilty.
I wouldn't get it, but I already have several lenses that cover this range.

Usually, but not always, the wider the zoom range the worse quality (there are a few exceptions, like the Sigma 50-500, but they are rare.)

Eric
eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18, 2004, 1:41 PM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 47
Default

Thanks for your time Eric, your info is much appreciated. It looks as if I will pass on this lense...
Maff is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:01 PM.