|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 140
|
![]()
inside the church of mafra's monastery - convento de mafra
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 6,263
|
![]()
That's the second statue I admired today featuringa similar theme...I also likedyour composition including theexquisite flowers below.
A little highlight adjustment on it would work better IMO! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sparta, Greece
Posts: 2,649
|
![]()
Nice image i also like the composition
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,782
|
![]()
Nice shot, might be improved by higher iso or stronger flash.
..................... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 6,263
|
![]()
While appreciating musket's words above, I would like to add that; sincenot a great deal ofinfogot lost in this shot (ah, think of the original file from that great cam with IS and 2/3 ccd) due to severe overexposure, I thinkone may regain someof it through a proper pp.
Here's a quick attempt. Hope you don't mind : ) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 140
|
![]()
i don't mind, but i prefer my version :lol:
what do u mean with lost info? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Posts: 6,263
|
![]()
D3v1l wrote:
Quote:
It was the amount of optical input from the object transferred into digital data to make the final image we can see, and which I thought well conveyed through your shot requiring no re-shoot at all :| |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 140
|
![]()
i will take that as a praise
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|