|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 407
|
![]()
Two archived examples.
1 ![]() 2 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 8,466
|
![]()
The first photo (trees) definitely shows the effects of backlighting, especially the tree in the foreground. However, the second shot, although an excellent silhouette, shows none.
I call it as I see it. Cal |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 407
|
![]()
Its OK Calr, I think I misunderstood part of the challenge. I was thinking that a silhouette would be a product of backlighting. Only translucent objects can be directly illuminated from backlight, illuminated solid objects would have to be lit from other objects reflecting the backlight.
Last edited by philby; May 19, 2011 at 8:27 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA USA
Posts: 8,116
|
![]()
I would think that one would consider the clouds to be backlit. Nice shot in any event.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|