|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 374
|
![]()
These look a whole lot better in PS as web browsers don't have proper colour management, but anyway, here is some shallow dof.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 374
|
![]()
Exposure was slightly adjusted, yes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 2,917
|
![]()
Hi Gerafix
Both are interesting photos, and clearly display a shallow depth of field. I really like the flower photo's colours. I am interested how it might have looked with a bit more stem of the main two flowers (towards the left of the photo) and taken in a portrait orientation. What is that second photo of? Water... but what and how? Thanks for sharing Paul |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canada
Posts: 374
|
![]()
Thank you, yes I was entirely focused on the one on the left that is following the rule of thirds, didn't think of the other two really.
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Southern New Hampshire
Posts: 5,202
|
![]()
Both are nice. I like the idea of the water. Hadn't thought of that.
Patty |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|