|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 730
|
![]()
I need a tripod!
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,196
|
![]()
looks like either you or the flower moved just a bit!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 8,466
|
![]()
Something moved! I see at least three images of the flower there. A tripod is definately in order. You could use a faster shutter speed but you will lose your depth of field.
Cal |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,204
|
![]()
As noted a tripod would probably aid quite a bit.
In the absence of a tripod a number of things you can do to significantly reduce the shakes.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chester, UK
Posts: 2,980
|
![]() Quote:
As I've just gone back to a camera with 'up to 6' and 'up to 30, store the last 6' burst modes, I might well try it for these shaky occasions. I could just keep my finger down, and hope to to catch a turning point in the oscillations of my shaky hands. There must be a poem or song to be made of that phrase. "Ode to elderly photgraphers who need tripods for themselves, not their cameras", perhaps? I fear the problem this fortnight has been that most folk will have rubbed out their obvious mistakes, except when they're of sentimental value. All mine that spring to mind are from my most recent holiday, where I haven't got round yet to tidying up yet. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South San Francisco, California
Posts: 142
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|