Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Biweekly Shoot Out

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 3, 2007, 6:52 AM   #1
selvin's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,204

This is on the National Historic registry and harkens back to the days of the Hawaiian Royalty at the turn of the century before the overthrow by US business interests.

The palace has been faithfully restored to much of its original splendor. Where possible the original artisan style of work has been used so it has been a combination of rebuilding, restoration and some guesswork. I shudder to think how much the restoration etc. has cost.

One of the last major steps is to re-furbish. It is estimated over 10,000 pieces of furniture existed for the palace only about a third have been acquired. Others are in collections worldwide, and some lost forever. To preserve the delicate nature of the many artifacts, photographs of the inside are never allowed, a pity. The Royal feather capes are among the most spectacular holdings.

selvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 3, 2007, 7:32 AM   #2
Senior Member
Walter C's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA USA
Posts: 7,902

I remember seeing that impressive structure sitting on an expansive piece of property. Thanks for sharing.
Walter C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2007, 12:09 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,288

Beautiful palace! I very much enjoy reading the descriptions to everyones post!

bhammitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 3, 2007, 8:32 PM   #4
calr's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 8,466

Outstanding shots, Selvin and thanks for the narrative. I understand the reason for not allowing flash photography inside. The UV light emitted by the flash can harm antique items. However, available light photography does no damage and I would think would be allowed. Can you clarify this? I have run into several situations where flash was not permitted do to the antiquities on display but they all allow photos without flash.


calr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 4, 2007, 8:10 AM   #5
Senior Member
D.Ann's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,932

Interesting shot and narrative! D onna
D.Ann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 4, 2007, 1:13 PM   #6
Senior Member
thkn777's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,831

Hm, for some reason this reminds me of spanish architecture... #2 is the most interesting shot for me - I would like to see an even closer look at that main staircase with the wall details and the pillars.

Thanks for sharing - I guess I have a somewhat biased imagination of Hawaii coming from TV mostly... you know - that "vacation resort" thingie.

Narf - so many places on earth I have never been to and they all look interesting. :sad:
thkn777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 4, 2007, 7:40 PM   #7
selvin's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 7,204

Walter, Bob, Donna,

Thanks for your kind comments. I alaways liked when individuals gave some background to their shots and feel obligated to return the favor.


I am actually attending class on Hawaiian history which is held on the grounds of the palace. I will ask you questions about why not allow non-flash pictures inside. I suspect this might be due to the fact that they really have a difficult time monitoring all visitors and trying to squelch all flash photogs especially those with P&S flash who haven't got a clue how to turn off auto-flash would be a challenge.


Will see what I can do about close up deatils surrounding the steps and staircases.

A mahalo to all.
selvin is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:37 AM.