Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 31, 2004, 8:00 AM   #1
Junior Member
pellegrini's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 17
Default f 2.8 lenses quality and digital pro 1 performance?

You said that for night clubs (alive shows covers = alive performances indoors) pro one wasn't your frist choice. Why? Just because of the AF response or for the image quality? Talking about these, could you say a picture taken with Pro 1 against one sigma f2.8 (28-70/24-70 or 70-200) will reach the same quality of image.
If i put one in front the other i hard tell the difference?
And Pro gtes better images than g5?

Thank you very much.
pellegrini is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 31, 2004, 11:55 AM   #2
Senior Member
Greg Chappell's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,589

Comparing the Pro 1 vs. a Sigma f2.8 zoom mounted on ANY DSLR is just asking to be disappointed in the Pro 1.

1. Noise at higher ISO ratings- My Canon Digital Rebel is virtually noise free at ISO 400 and darn clean at ISO 800. It's very acceptable at ISO 1600. The Pro 1 will be unacceptable at ISO 400, so you are already at a disadvantage with the Pro 1 before looking at anything else.

2. I hate electronic viewfinders so I am biased in saying this, but bias or not a TRUE through the lens viewfinder of an SLR is much nicer and more accurate to use than these nasty EVF's digicam makers use in digicams. Every one I ever tried had a lag time that made it hard to catch something at just the right moment, and I would think in concert photography that would be something you would be interested in.

3. Focusing speed- I am sure this hasn't changed enough in the Pro 1 for me to be wrong. The focusing system in a DSLR will be MUCH faster than trying to latch onto and follow a performer on stage with the Pro 1.

I own a G5 and wouldn't want to use it at a concert. For one, unless you are in row 1 or 2 it doesn't have a long enough tele lens to get you there. AF performance in low light at the tele end isn't the greatest either.

I am sure you can take the Pro 1 to a concert and get some decent grab shots, but don't think for one minute it would be the same as taking a high end pro zoom like the Sigma you talk about mounted to (any) DSLR available today. That is a no-brainer. The DSLR would outperform the Pro 1 at any level you would want to look at.

HOWEVER, unless you are Press you might not be able to get a DSLR in with todays security at events.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 PM.