Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 22, 2007, 11:08 AM   #1
Junior Member
spinart361's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3

Hello, can I ask anyone why is it when i set my Canon A630 to aperture
priority mode, and set it to a lower aperture value like F2.8 or
F3.2, the background still doesn't look blurred? When i look at the
shooting information of the picture, i found out that the camera
automatically sets the shutter speed to low value like 1/30 or 1/40.
I suspect that this cause the picture to look detailed, am i right?
What can I do to get the blurred background?

I also tried using the TV mode to get higher shutter speed value,
but again the camera automatically sets the aperture to high values.
Another thing that I tried was to use the manual mode and set the
aperture value to F2.8 and set the shutter speed to 1/500 which gave
me underexposed photo.

spinart361 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 22, 2007, 11:38 AM   #2
JimC's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Savannah, GA (USA)
Posts: 22,378

If you try to use a shutter speed that's too fast for the lighting, ISO speed and aperture, you'll get underexposed images. If you try to use a shutter speed that's too slow for the ISO speed lighting and aperture, you'll get overexposed images. ;-)

So, you can't just use anything you want to. Use the camera's meter to let you know if your settings will result in under or overexposure if you want to use manual exposure.

No, using a slower shutter speed won't give you the desired effect (unless you want your subject and your background to be blurry), although if you're panning with a moving subject, that's a technique that can work with practice. But, that's just because of the blur from camera movement across the frame.

I answer this question (why can't I get a blurred background) periodically. So, I'm just copying an answer from another recent thread to here:

Zoom in, get closer, frame tighter. Go for a head shot versus a full length shot.

As a result of a very tiny sensor compared to 35mm film, the lens on most non-dslr digital cameras can have a much shorter actual focal length, to get any given 35mmequivalentfocal length (i.e, the same angle of view as you'd have with the lens on a 35mm camera)..

Look at the front of your lens and you'll probably see the actual focal length printed (along with it's aperture ratings for the wide angle and full telephoto zoom positions).

So, your subject occupies a much larger percentage of the frame at any given actual focal length, compared to a 35mm camera at the same distance to subject with most digicams, and you'll have much more Depth of Field compared to a camera with a larger sensor (or film).. This isbecause Depth of Field is computed by the actual versus 35mm equivalent focal length,focus distance,and aperture.

Your ability to blur the background for any given aperture depends on your subject size, the percentage of the frame you need it to occupy (which you can use focal length or the distance to your subject to change), and the distance to the background that you want your subject to stand out from. Of course, using the largest available aperture (represented by the smallest f/stop number) helps - but this is usually not enough to achieve the desired results for larger subjects with most non-DSLR models (i.e., your people photos).

Your best bet is to frame as tightly as possible (fill the frame by getting in closer or using more zoom). In other words, go for a tight head and shoulders, versus a full length shot. You'll want to use the camera's largest available aperture (smallest f/stop number), and put as much distance as possible between the subject and background.

You could also try focusing in front of the subject (so that your subject is barely in the area of acceptable sharpness).

Load this Depth of Field Calculator and selectyour camera model. Then, plug in the *actual* focal length of the lens, focus distance and aperture to calculate Depth of Field. Keep in mind that "acceptable sharpness" is not the same thing as "acceptable blur" though.


Of course, keep in mind that when you use more optical zoom, you'll need to be further away from your subject for it to occupy the same percentage of the frame (hence, cancelling out thebenefits of longer focal lengths in some shooting conditions where you'd want less Depth of Field, especially since the largest available aperture requires the wide angle lens position with most compact digital cameras).

Although the perspective changes (more compressed background from shooting further away) can give the illusion of a shallower depth of field, since blur in out of focus areas will be more obvious (even if the real depth of field isn't changing, since you need to take the photo from further away if you use more zoom for the same framing). So, zooming in can often help (even though you'll have a smaller aperture, represented by a higher f/stop number with a compact lens design like yours).

So, for many scenarios, unless you can budget for a DSLR model (which have much larger sensors compared to non-DSLR digital cameras), your best bet is to try and use software to simulate a shallow depth of field for larger subjects.

Sbooting small, subjects from close distances is one thing. Trying to blur the background with larger subjects is something else entirely (since you need to be further away to get them fitted in the frame, increasing depth of field).

That's one of the appeals of a DSLR (the ability to control Depth of Field for helping your subjects stand out from distracting backgrounds). The sensors are just too small for that in non-DSLR models (unless your shooting smaller subjects).

A non-DSLR model with much greater depth of field like your camera can be a good thing, too.

You may want more depth of field versus less, and with a DSLR model, you'd need to stop down the aperture (smaller aperture represented by higher f/stop numbers) to get it (often requiring much higher ISO speeds or slower shutter speeds to achieve what you can get with a non-DSLR model shooting at wide open apertures.

There are pros and cons to both types of systems.

Short Answer:

Use the largest available aperture (smaller f/stop numbers), zoom in, get closer, frame tighter. Go for a head shot versus a full length shot to have a better chance at more background blur, putting more space between your subject and the background.

JimC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 22, 2007, 6:24 PM   #3
Junior Member
spinart361's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 3

Thank you for your detailed explanation. It really helped me understand the capabilities and limitations of my camera. I'll definitely try your suggestions.
spinart361 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 AM.