Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 24, 2004, 12:03 PM   #11
Senior Member
Paul(UK)'s Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 290

Mr_Saginaw wrote:
here you go...

Thanks. I see it's lost a little sharpness, but the noise reduction has done a fantastic job. It's turned it from a useable photo into a great one
Paul(UK) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2004, 11:53 AM   #12
Senior Member
minutephotos.com's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 344

I currently have a Conon Drebel and have been thinking of upgrading to 20d also. Would you recommend upgrading lens first to L-series lens or upgrading 300d to 20D.

Which will I see more improvement to actual photos better lens or better camera?

I have the 580EX flash, 18-55 kit 55-200, and 50 1.8.
minutephotos.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2004, 5:45 PM   #13
Senior Member
Mr_Saginaw's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 552

I guess it really depends on what your needs are... On the lower ISOs I'm guessing the image quality will be about the same. The 20D of course has more pixels but for what I do the DRebel's 6.2 was enough... the extra MPs just allows more cropping..

For me I shot mostly in the upper ISO range 800/1600 and now 3200... so for me that was enough reason to upgrade. I've also have a couple of 2.8 lens that I'm happy with...

Mr_Saginaw is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.