Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 6, 2005, 1:55 AM   #11
Randy G.'s Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 73

It's sort of like trying to recommend underwear, isn't it? Too many factors to consider with too little info. :roll:

Just using the camera for "snapshots"? Family, zoo, vacations, pets, personal enjoyment, and only want one lens? The Sig 18-125 is probably the best choice for the money.

Need sharp, high quality images and want the creativity that control over DOF that a large aperture gives you and still wnat a zoom? One of the faster 2.8 lenses available (my choice was the Sig 24-70 for the moment).

Need total DOF and low-light capability? Try a bag full of primes, or at least include two or three to cover a general range of wide, medium and near-telephoto.

Thong, bikini briefs, whitie-tighties, or boxers? Only you can decide what fits you best! :O
Randy G. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6, 2005, 2:17 AM   #12
Super Moderator
Hards80's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046

LOL!!! well put randy... :lol:
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 6, 2005, 6:34 AM   #13
Senior Member
NHL's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,599


It's all boil down to is 'IS' worth the extra $400 - if it's not, go for the flexibility of the longer range and spend that extra money on a 70-400 f/4 L or something...

Do you think this photographer need 'IS'?: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic2/143791
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:11 AM.