|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,397
|
![]()
I think we need helium filled lenses that just float along :!:Or Hydrogen filled ones for those more explosive situations :blah:.
Peter. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 52
|
![]()
I used the Canon 1.4 extender on this lens with excellent results. As for the tripod collar, it's optional because the lens only weight 1.5 lbs. You don't need a tripod collar for that weight. I had no problem using the camera mount. There are many many lenses weighing as much that don't offer even an optional tripod collar.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,540
|
![]()
Thats pretty cool using the tele extender.
Gives you a 35mm equivalent of about a 400mm f/4 lens! -- Terry |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,599
|
![]()
[email protected] wrote:
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,397
|
![]()
The Equivalence Factor :!
![]() 200mm(real)*1.4(tc)*1.6(crop) = 448mm(virtual). IMHO: This thinking/converting everything to full-frame 35mm termshas got to stop. :blah:Time to start a new anti-35mm equivalence movement :blah: Peter. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,599
|
![]()
PeterP wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,397
|
![]()
Or did you mean 'just' 1/2 the right. :blah::blah::blah:
:cart: This could easily be compensated for by simply increasing the light output of the sun. :idea: DOH :homey: Never mind. ![]() Peter. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,599
|
![]()
Or made worse by a polarizer! :idea:
... which can tune out the reflection from the windshield of that Benz for example :blah: :blah: :blah: -> but it'll cost you @ least another 2-stops ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4
|
![]()
Hi you guys might want to read this review at http://www.eospix.com/reviews-14.html
They've reviewed the EF 70-200 f4Land the kenko 1.4x |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,540
|
![]()
Okay, here's another example of what the F/4 can do:
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|