Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 22, 2006, 7:39 PM   #1
as41shots's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 56

I know I am splitting hairs here, but was hoping for your thoughts on these lenses.

I plan to upgrade most of my glass to "L" series, with the exception of my Tokina 12-24mm, which for the foreseeable future I plan to keep.

So, do I go with the faster lens since the 70-200 covers the gap anyway, or is the extended range of the 24-135 plus having the IS a big enough bonus?

Then, as for the 70-200mm f/2.8L, is the IS worth the extra $500? For those of you who have worked with the lens without IS, have there been many times you wished you had that little extra benefit, one that jacks up the price by almost 50%?

Finally, for my trip to Alaska this summer, do I rent the 400 f/5.6L for $115 for three weeks, or buy the Tamron 200-500mm zoom? I am working with a 20D and Digital Rebel XT.

Oh, and don't tell my wife about this thread and my plans! :lol:



as41shots is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:55 AM.