Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 27, 2004, 5:15 AM   #1
Junior Member
dcislander's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6

Tough choice.
Is the 75-300IS really THAT bad? Is the 70-200L f4 really THAT much better?
Here's my conundrum...
I will be using the lens on a 300D, a comparatively light cam. The lens is for a lengthy globtrotting trip and will call my backpack home (=lighter is better). My big worry--I will NEVER be using a tripod or monopod. The lens is primarily for wildlife. I have never been able to shoot close up on a trip like this before and cannot decide if the extra 100mm would make or break the photo ops. That said, do you think the 70-200, hand held, fully zoomed would still produce consistenly better images than the 75-300IS? Thoughs on adding the 1.4x to it, or am I already in "shakey disaster" territory going hand held? Also, is the the 75-300 focus as painfully slow at 300mm as we are led to believe. I am an amature--think I'd be able to really tell the difference in speed?

I would like to stick to one of these lenses to take advantage of Canon's revate program (the bane of my existence). Today I pull the trigger on one of these 2 lenses. I highly value your opinions. What do you all think I should do?

Thanks much.
dcislander is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 27, 2004, 11:48 AM   #2
Senior Member
gibsonpd3620's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,585

I owned the 75-300 IS and sold it to buy the 70-200F4/L. The 70-200 is a superior lens IMO. I use the Tamron 1.4X Teleconverter to add some length to 70-200. I would not trade my 70-200 for the 75-300IS
gibsonpd3620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 31, 2004, 10:25 AM   #3
Senior Member
Greg Chappell's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Dallas, Texas USA
Posts: 6,589

Yes, I hope you made the decision to get the 70-200 f4. It is that much better. Besides the superior optics the 70-200 f4L uses the much better Ring USM instead of the Micro USM in the 75-300 IS and the 70-200 is much better built.

The 75-300 IS is a $200 lens with Image Stabilization built in, which jumps the price to a level not that far below the 70-200 f4L. The 70-200 f4L is the best deal in "L" glass. The 75-300 IS is about the most overpriced lens for what you get.
Greg Chappell is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.