Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 7, 2006, 2:28 AM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4

Have fairly recentlyboughtaCanon 30D ( with 17-85 EF-S ) Thinking of getting Macro lens, mainly for medical purposes such as photographing skin rashes, moles, lumps and bumps. What are the relative merits of getting the 60mm or 100mm? Would be grateful for any advice.

Thanks Ian.
IanMcM is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Oct 7, 2006, 7:28 AM   #2
Senior Member
wsandman1's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 318

The 60 mm will most likely be smaller. But it can only be used on a sub full-frame camera. It's also newer and made for the 30D

The 100 mm is a full-frame lens that a lot of L snobs have in their bags because of it's excellent quality. You will have increase magmification but that may be a problem or an advantage. It also focuses pretty fast for a macro an can be used as a portrait lens too.
wsandman1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 8, 2006, 7:56 AM   #3
Senior Member
NHL's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,564

An EF-S (digital lens only) will always be sharper than the full-frame equivalent:

There's some vignetting with the 60mm, but you'll be using theses lenses stopped down anyway!

-> it mainly depends on how far you'll be shooting these samples or the ease of lighting which may dictate which lens to pick
NHL is online now   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:04 PM.