Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 24, 2006, 12:46 AM   #11
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 18

Please indulge me for another moment or two. Comparing the following, what would be the wisest for a general hobbyist (assuming I'm going to get a 70-300 for nature and wildlife)? Besides the range, IQ is critical, and has to be better than the kit lens.

1. Sigma 17-70
2. Tamron 24-135
3. Canon 17-85IS
4. Tamron 28-75 f2.8 LD XR or whatever it's called
5. Canon 28-105 (I can get a used lens around $150)
6. Canon 28-135 IS
7. Sigma 24-70 f2.8 EX
8. Sigma 18-125 (I can get a used lens around $200)

The 28 mm ones will force me to keep the kit lens for wide angle shots. With the 24mm ones I think I may be fine without the kit lens.

As you can see, the range of lenses available is bewildering (and maddening, I must say). Now why doesn't someone come up with a quality 17-85 (to compete with the Canon, which is just too expensive at $500) or a 17-105 f2.8? Won't these be sweet?
bakaroni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 24, 2006, 12:50 AM   #12
Senior Member
terry@softreq.com's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,539

I have the Tamron 28-75 F2.8 lens, which is quite nice.

But having 17mm at the wide end is definitely much more flexible and useful.

I've seen some nice results from the Canon 17-85. Although it's F4, it does have image stabilization and at a street price of $500, it's a lot of lens for the money.

Nothing wrong with the kit lens. I've seen some pretty good photographers crank out some pretty good shots.

Then save up for a nice 70-200mm F2.8 lens

-- Terry
terry@softreq.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 24, 2006, 11:06 AM   #13
Senior Member
AlpineMan's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 357

My main subjects are family shots indoors. I had the Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 as my first lens with my former 20D. It just wasn't wide enough for a crop camera...so I replaced it with a Sigma 18-50mm f2.8...what a difference! I then heard a lot of good things about the Tamron 17-50 f2.8...so I sold my Sigma...indeed, IQ-wise, the Tamron is better. Among the lenses you listed, you may want to add this Tamron, it'd be on top of the list as far as IQ goes.
AlpineMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2006, 6:59 PM   #14
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 238

Looking at this list and assuming you are going to get 70-300mm lens I would go with Sigma 17-70 lens. If you can live with doing zoom with your feet or switching to 70-300mm lens when you need more tele than a 50mm can provide then get Tamron 17-50mm as it is getting very good reviews for IQ (I don't haveTamron lens though).
harana is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:00 PM.