Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 16, 2007, 9:46 AM   #1
Senior Member
killdeer0007's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,328

Has anyone tried this combination? I'm trying to justify buying the 300 F2.8 and 2X extender. The 2X will be used on the 70-200 and the 300. If these combinations work I'll retire my 300 F4. I was thinking of the 400 DO andusing my1.4 extender but have pretty much given up on that idea.

All advice is greatly appreciated.

killdeer0007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 16, 2007, 10:46 AM   #2
Senior Member
John at the Beach's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Southeastern NC
Posts: 491

I use the 1.4x on my 70-200 2.8L and it works fine except for a slight vignette at
the 200mm end...Not a problem for me because I like the effect on some shots...It
it messes up the shot, I crop it out...I say this about the 1.4x because I am sure you will get the same effect with the 2x....

John at the Beach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 16, 2007, 11:05 AM   #3
Senior Member
Tomsch's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 442

I have used that lens configuration on occation and had good results. When using a 70-200 off hand like at a crowded zoo it is easy to stick a 2X in your pocket. I have difficulty telling the shots I used the 2X and those I did not. No degradition at all.

Attached Images
Tomsch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 16, 2007, 2:26 PM   #4
Senior Member
Caboose's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 625

for my money, instead of the 400 f4 DO for about the same price you can get the 500 f4 L. Just my 2 cents. They are both really expensive lenses, which I could afford either.
Caboose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 18, 2007, 7:06 AM   #5
Senior Member
NHL's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,567

killdeer0007 wrote:
... If these combinations work I'll retire my 300 F4...
This is going to be controversial, but i'm going to lay it out for you anyway
-> An f/4 lens is in general always sharper than an equivalent f/2.8 lens of the same focal lenght (i.e. less complex to design and the light path is less oblique resulting in higher contrast)

You can verify the MTF's results of the Canon 70-200 f/4 vs the 70-200 f/2.8, the Sigma 100-300 f/4 vs the 120-300 f/2.8. This is no different with the Canon 300 f/4 vs the 300 f/2.8:

BTW they also recorded the 300mm f/2.8L results with a 2x so you'll know relatively where it'll stand against other lenses
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 21, 2007, 11:43 PM   #6
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Monson, Maine
Posts: 52

Kildeer, I have the F2.8 300mm and have used it with both the 1.4 and 2.0 Canon extenders with great results. Autofocus works with both although slightly slower with the 2.0. I also have the 70-200 F4 lens and also have used both extenders with it, however with the 2.0, results are not nearly as good as with the 300mm. The faster 300mm is just a supurb lens, not only for sports but also a great portrait lens where blurred background is desired. I believe you will be happy with the lens whatever task you assign to it.
dlearyfun is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 PM.