Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 21, 2007, 5:49 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 11
Default

How do the Sigma Lenses 70-300mm F4-5.6 DG Macro and 28-70mm F2.8-4 DG compare with the Canon EF-S 17-85mm f/4-5.6 IS USM Zoom and EF 70-300 f/4-5.6 IS USM Zoom?

If given the choice between the two, which would you recommend? I've been told that the Canon lenses were really designed for 35mm cameras and hense not as good as the Sigma's which are for digicams only.

I'm using a Canon Digital Rebel XTi.

Any suggestions? Comments?

Thanks.:?:
peterpica is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 21, 2007, 8:54 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
surfnron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 578
Default

You have been given bad info. Canon and Sigma both make 35mm, (full frame), lenses and digital lenses. I suggest you go to this site: http://www.fredmiranda.com .
They have reviews of these lenses.
Ron

surfnron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 21, 2007, 10:29 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
elduderino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 114
Default

You can't really compare the Sigma 70-300 to the Canon 70-300 IS. The Sigma is a budget lens at $200, while the Canon is over $500. I have the Sigma and am quite happy with it, for the price. But I would take the Canon over it in a heartbeat.
elduderino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 22, 2007, 9:35 AM   #4
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 48
Default

Canon 70-300 USM IS is much better lens, including optical stabilization. Sigma is budget lens, and good one for that money, and quite usable in 70-200 range, even wide open. Have one, would prefer better, but not money for that.

Actually, if you have 500$ add a bit more and consider Canon 70-200L f4. Quite impressive resolution, colour and built quality.
nidza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 27, 2007, 11:43 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Hayward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,318
Default

Then again the Sigma 70-30mm on an internally stabilized Pentax K10D is a wonderfull lens for the money even at full zoom and a Tam 1.4x TC on it.

When The K10D came out I said goodbye to my Rebel with same lens (Without IS much more problemastic in low light)

And not even a hint of when there might ever be a C 40D... with the 30D now aging.



Hayward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2007, 7:56 AM   #6
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529
Default

Hayward wrote:
Quote:
Then again the Sigma 70-30mm on an internally stabilized Pentax K10D is a wonderfull lens for the money even at full zoom and a Tam 1.4x TC on it.

With all due respect - how is this relevant?

First let's look at why the Sigma 70-300 is only a mediocre performance - 2 major reasons:

1. Soft between 200mm-300mm (and that's without a TC)

2. Slow focusing (i.e. doesn't have HSM)

Please, Hayward, tell us how the internal stabalization of the Pentax corrects these shortcomings?

In truth, I'm glad you are happy with your camera - by all accounts it is a very nice camera. But the concept that internal stabalization suddenly turns a decent budget lens into a great performer doesn't hold much water.
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2007, 9:04 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 734
Default

The Sigma 70-300mm is a budget lens, everybody knows that, poeple upgrade from P&S mostly have limitedfund to buy quality lenses, it doesn't mean that they can't enjoy the hobby, therefore the Sigma is a good alternative, let's set that aside.

Now the antishake,:-):-):-)...

I invite Hayward to Canon country to see how we handle the Canon,:-):-):-)

Look at this Canon photographer, he even have two cameras at the same time, one on each hand not on his neck, he barely use his fingers to zoom, he shoot with one hand holding the cameras like toys.


Attached Images
 
coldshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2007, 9:06 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 734
Default

...in front of an audience like this


Attached Images
 
coldshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2007, 9:11 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 734
Default

...You haven't seen a woman using a Canon dslr with one hand the other hand she grasps the kid.
Attached Images
 
coldshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 28, 2007, 9:33 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 734
Default

Now, let's check to see how's Canon is doing.

http://www.thestreet.com/_yahoo/fund...0345794_2.html
coldshot is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:46 PM.