Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 1, 2008, 12:56 PM   #1
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 30

Anyone here give the new Tamron 28-300 with VC a workout yet? Looking to get a bit farther out than my current 28-200mm allows and wouldn't be averse to spending the $$ for the VC (or IS) if it proves to be a quality lens. The Canon 70-300 USM IS seems a great choice at 30 bucks less than the Tamron 28-300 but it does give up quite a bit at the low end of the range.

Natty is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 2, 2008, 9:52 AM   #2
Senior Member
Cyberf828's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 659

I cant say anything about the Tamrom lens but I really enjoy my Canon 70-300 USM IS, takes some really nice photos.
Cyberf828 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 2, 2008, 9:57 AM   #3
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529


First off - no I haven't tried it. But I guess it all depends on what your definition of a "quality lens" is. Without exception, the more focal range a given lens covers the more compromises the developer makes. Part of it is engineering challenges, but a large part is economics.

Superzoom lenses like that will almost never perform as well as quality lenses with a shorter zoom. Typically where you will see the most issues is at the extremes - at the long end and at the wide end.

I'm not saying don't get a superzoom (since you already have one) - I'm mearly suggesting 'quality' and 'superzoom' don't go hand in hand.
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 2, 2008, 11:03 AM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,974

I agree with JohnG. I believe the development of this particular lens are for those who want a one lens does all. A walk around lens if you will. Even with the crop factor in cameras people still want more reach.

style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #000000"This lens would be good for trips and shots that are not super critical in needs of making then best shots count. Primes are still the way to go as well as fast glass but that is where economics come into play.

style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #000000"The first batch were recalled right away so its anyone's guess as to the quality the lens has to offer.

style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #000000"Mahalo,

style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #000000"Tom
vIZnquest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 3, 2008, 2:58 PM   #5
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 30

Thanks! I understand and fully appreciate your point. I can relate it to rifle scopes and how Ireluctantlyswitched frommy fixed, 6x scope to a zoom model at the strong advice from a pro guide who would be leading a trip I went on a few years back. The fixed scopeswere always my first choice. When I made the move to a mutli-mag scope I kept the range to a minimum and went with a 2x-7x model versus thebig. multi-mag models. Keep it simple.

Not wanting to get way too far ahead of myself with respect to gear, I decided to go way to the lowendand learn how to make it work to it's best potential rather. I picked up a Promaster (Tamron) 70-300 f/3.5 -6.3 for a fraction of what either of the two Imentioned earlier cost. It will get me a bit farther out for those bball and softball games and force me to learn proper techniques while still being aperfectly good and fairly inexpensive lens.


Natty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2008, 5:15 PM   #6
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 7


Here is POP Photos review.
Southswede1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:14 AM.