Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 29, 2010, 10:49 PM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 21
Default

And the difference between the 70-200 f4L and the 70-300 IS USM? Can someone explain? There is about a $100 price difference. How are the lenses in terms of weight? Faster focusing? How important is it to have IS? Which one would be faster if I also plan on taking pictures of kids?
gavsmompa2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 29, 2010, 11:07 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,572
Default

Both the 70-200/4.0 and the 70-300 IS have UltraSonic Motors, and so are each likely to be fast enough for shooting kid's sports. The 70-200/4.0 is bigger and heavier, probably because of its ;arger aperture and the bigger, heavier optical elements that requires. For sports/action, IS isn't important. You need to keep the shutter speed high to prevent motion blur due to subject movement, and that will also take care of the motion blur due to camera shake.

For shooting in daylight, they are both equally capable, but the 70-300 gives you more reach, which is especially important since you'll be shooting from the stands.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.

Last edited by TCav; Mar 30, 2010 at 12:02 PM. Reason: REALLY bad spelling.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2010, 10:32 AM   #13
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TCav View Post
Both the 70-200/4.0 and the 70-300 IS have UlreaSonic Motors, and so are each likely to be fast enough for shooting kid's sports. T.
They have different types of USM motors - the 70-300 has micro USM and the 70-200 f4 has ring USM. The F4 will be faster to focus. It's also sharper AND has an extra stop of aperture so you get faster shutter speeds. And even in daytime you'd be amazed how you can need wider apertures. I've shot daytime sports at f2.8 and ISO 800 because of overcast conditions.

But all of that is pointless if you're not close enough for 200mm to be useful. For sports shooting the working range of a 200mm lens is roughly 25 yards, roughly 40 yards for a 300mm lens.
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:47 AM.