Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 15, 2010, 9:26 AM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 80
Default Ultra-wide angles: Canon, Sigma, Tokina

I know, another question from me, sorry guys. But I've done a lot more reading, looking at various types of shots, and studying up on a lot of lenses, and I think I've figured out a bit more of my tastes since my last thread.

Again, I have a T2i with the kit lens. After looking at a bunch of different shots from a bunch of different lenses, I think I've figured out that I really like the type of image an ultra wide angle lens produces (I had been asking about telephoto zooms and macros before, but I think that the other direction may be more for me right now). From what I've been reading, the favorites seem to be the Canon EF-S 10-22, Sigma 10-20, and the Tokina 11-16.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but here's a brief overview of what I've gathered:

The Sigma comes in at the lowest price in exchange for softer edges and more distortion.

The Tokina has the sharpest image with the least distortion in exchange for a narrower range and a little more CA than others. As a result, it's a bit more, and in stock absolutely nowhere, used or otherwise.

The Canon has the best balance, better than the Sigma with distortion and sharpness, better than the Tokina with CA, and better than both with light control. However, it's also the most expensive, and is also not to be found used anywhere.

I know it's been asked in the past, but what are your opinions on these three lenses? I'm really leaning towards spending the extra $100 for the Tokina over the Sigma, but it's never in stock anywhere but eBay, where it sells for nearly $200 over B&H. Or is the Sigma good enough that I don't need to worry about hunting down the Tokina for the extra dough? And I'm willing to buy used if it can come at a discount, but I can't find them used anywhere but eBay, where it's all over the cost of a new one!

I feel like the Canon, while being a fantastic lens, is just a bit too much with the Tokina sitting in the middle, especially when my kit lens covers almost all of the missing range the Canon covers.

I'd like to be able to get one of them by May 17th when I go to Ireland for two weeks.
cjp87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Apr 15, 2010, 10:26 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 349
Default

did you check adorama.com?

http://www.adorama.com/Als/ProductLi...t=10&Offset=10
__________________
My crappy Flickr

Last edited by ronin2307; Apr 15, 2010 at 10:28 AM.
ronin2307 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2010, 10:42 AM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 80
Default

Item is currently backordered from the manufacturer, according to their site.
cjp87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2010, 10:44 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 349
Default

yeah i just noticed that. sorry for misleading you
__________________
My crappy Flickr
ronin2307 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2010, 10:47 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 349
Default

fwiw, i was reading a bit about the canon one, and came across a few reviews from people who said that the canon one is f5.6 at 22mm and they said that the shots they liked with this lens were mostly in the 17+ range, so they returned the lens and opted for the 17-40mm L lens, which supposedly was much more useful.

Again, please take this with a huge grain of salt as i have no experience whatsoever with any of these lenses. just telling you what i have read
__________________
My crappy Flickr
ronin2307 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2010, 12:08 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

tokina would be my pick, it really is a great lens.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2010, 12:21 PM   #7
Super Moderator
 
Mark1616's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,397
Default

If you can find it then the Tokina is the way to go after that I'm not sure as I wasn't ever a huge fan of either.... then again you have to ask what you will be using it for. If you are not printing large then the issues go away, for me I just couldn't get the quality I wanted to use them on a job.
__________________
Any problems with a post or thread please use the report button at the bottom left of the post and the team will help sort it out.

Have fun everyone!


See what I'm up to visit my Plymouth Wedding Photography
site or go to my blog.
Mark1616 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2010, 9:57 AM   #8
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 80
Default

So I think, should I be able to find it in stock anywhere, I've just about decided on going for the Tokina. B&H and all the usual sources seem to be out of stock indefinitely, and the only place I've found is a Taiwanese dive shop that's charing $80 over the American stores to have it shipped.

Does anyone know of maybe a lesser-known photo store online that may have this lens in stock? I know I'm currently waiting on a response from Berger Brothers in New York, but any leads would be great.
cjp87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 22, 2010, 10:01 AM   #9
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

The Tokina is the easy choice here for an ultrawide. It is sharp, constant, fast, and low distortion.

Build quality is also above the rest. I have the Tokina 12-24 (its older sibling lens) and it has never let me down, my go-to lens.
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 23, 2010, 8:03 PM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 80
Default

Well, I just bit the bullet on the Tokina 11-16. It was kindof tough to swallow spending 2/3 the cost of the camera on a lens (I'm an amateur, after all!), but I think it'll be worth it in the long run since these are the types of shots I kept going back to. I had to pay a bit over retail for shipping, but it was way better than the asking prices at Amazon!
cjp87 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:10 PM.