Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 17, 2010, 8:22 PM   #1
Junior Member
rrwilliams64's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 11
Default Zoom lens decision for 50D

Looking for some input on a zoom choice for my 50D
Here's my present glass lineup:
Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 (non VC)
Canon EF 85mm f/1.8

I was using the 55-250mm IS with my old XSi, but want a piece of glass that will match the 50D's resolving power.

I was initially considering a Sigma APO 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM , as they can be found on eBay at discounted prices, but Sigma quality varies from copy to copy (50D microadjusting notwithstanding) and it is a bigger, heavier piece of glass.

That said, I was set on the Canon 70-200 f/4, as its the sharpest of the Canon 70-200 series, given your shooting needs dont require IS or 2.8.

The last lens in my triad is the Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM . Looking for thoughts on this vs. the Canon 70-200 f/4. I dont necessarily need the extra reach, (but who knows when the need may arise, it is nice to have), and this lens has IS and is a tad cheaper. Thoughts?...is the 70-200 f4 that much better? (esp re: IQ)

...my shooting will be outdoors, some indoors as light allows lacking 2.8, a mixed bag of everyday shooting needs.

Bottom line, is there a consensus on which of the aforementioned would be a better choice, price/performance ratio considered? Also, am I being biased and premature to preclude the Sigma? ahhh, decisions
rrwilliams64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Oct 17, 2010, 9:02 PM   #2
Senior Member
shoturtle's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348

the 70-200f4L is a very sharp lens, and has better build quality the the ef 70-300 IS USM. It also focus faster. But the 70-300 is light, longer reach and has IS which helps out.

On your 55-250IS, did you find yourself shooting over 200mm allot. If so, then the 300mm might be a better options.

post 37 of this link will give you an idea what to expect with the ef 70-300 at 200 and at 300mm

Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 18, 2010, 3:13 AM   #3
Senior Member
TCav's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,683

The 70-300 IS USM will be useless indoors unless you're shooting still life with a tripod. The 70-200/4 would be ok for plays, recitals, etc., but for sports/action, you'll need to crank up the ISO to get decent shutter speeds. The Sigma 70-200/2.8 is generally highly regarded, though it's IQ isn't as good as the other lenses you mentioned.

I think you want a little too much from a single lens.
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:30 PM.