Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 12, 2005, 8:41 AM   #11
Super Moderator
 
peripatetic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,599
Default

I'm not sure that any conclusions can be drawn about the design of this lens from the flecks inside Jake's copy, it would seem fairly clear that this a problem in the clean-room manufacturing environment of the batch of lenses that were sent to SA.

L lenses have better weather & dust sealing and you pay for that.

Every individual must judge the various aspects of a purchase and draw their own conclusions about the value-for-money of a lens for themselves. For me the excellent IS, the zoom range and the superior sharpness of the 17-85 make it worth the price.

You get what you pay for, but you're not always paying for the same things. Canon could have put the 17-85 optics and IS in an L-grade casing, but it would then have been even more expensive. None of the camera bodies that accept the S lenses are weather sealed so it's not surprising that they chose not to do so.
peripatetic is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:39 AM.