Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 15, 2005, 3:31 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 9
Default

Hello,

I have a Canon 10d and I am looking to get a decent wide angle lens. Right now all I have is a 28-90 which doesnt really cover the wide range with the crop factor. My question is about the pro's and con's of the Tamron 17-35 vs. the Sigma 17-35. I think the HSM on the Sigma for faster and quieter focusing, but can it really be much faster? Both cost about the same so the only thing I take off points for the Sigma would be the 82mm filter size. I will be shooting mainly Architecture and Landscapes, so anyone who has experience with either of these two lenses, I would be glad to know what you think.



Thanks alot.
jl0gue is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 15, 2005, 5:32 AM   #2
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,547
Default

I have the Sigma 17-35 EX, the HSM is not only faster and quieter, but it also offers full time AF manual overide with this feature so there's no need to slide the M/AF switch first - The new 'DG' version is filtered for 77mm and not 82mm, and check its MTF if you want (only to 15 for the 10D): http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/len...58&navigator=1

The faster f/2.8 also helps @ sunrise/sunset :idea:


BTW if you don't mind not having f/2.8 or HSM you can gain an extra 2mm with the 15-30 EX. On the 10D (or any cropped dSLR) you can actually mount a front filter in the threaded opening of the included lens cap...
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 15, 2005, 11:02 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 575
Default

jl0gue,

Before christmas, I was having the same problem of deciding between the Tamron and Sigma. My wonderful xmass fairy (gf) got me the Sigma 17-35, and oh man...

The build quality, AF speed, sharpness and contrast are just sweet. Bokeh isn't bad either. I highly recommend this lens. IMHO a much better buy than the Tamron, and at 60% cost of the 17-40 Canon, a better deal there too!

David

www.pbase.com/simms65
Gandalf065 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:32 PM.