Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 3, 2005, 8:40 AM   #11
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,547
Default

... As to macro don't discount Sigma either: http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/v...76&forum_id=65

This is also slighly faster than the 180mm: http://www.sigmaphoto.com/lenses/len...83&navigator=5
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 3, 2005, 1:37 PM   #12
Super Moderator
 
Hards80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 9,046
Default

could also save a little money on the wide end with a combo of

sigma 17-35 2.8-4 ex dg hsm

+

sigma 24-70 2.8 ex dg macro or 24-60 2.8 ex dg

..combine that with nhl's mention of the 120-300 2.8 and you may be able to save enough money for a tri/monopod, some filters, and a big bag to carry it all in..
Hards80 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:35 PM.