Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 16, 2005, 1:18 PM   #11
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 175

Striderxl wrote:
Is it better to have a f2.8 lens or IS?I am looking into getting either the Sigma 24-70 2.8 (or the 28-70 2.8) or the 28-135 Canon IS.They are all around the same price so that doesnt matter.Looking for sharpness and I do shake a bit so I wasnt sure if the faster lens would help that.

Thanks for any help


As laready mentioned, it depends on what you shoot. For example, I shoot mostly wide landscapes where DOF is important, and I'm usually shooting in very early or late light. My 17-85IS allows me to get greater DOF, in lower light, without a tripod.

But on the telephoto end, I usually shoot action (surfing etc...), so I have a fast 2.8 long lens.
ChrisDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2005, 6:48 PM   #12
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10

F 2.8 for indoor shooting as it is brighter in the view finder for us old folks plus DOF options. 28-135 is nice for long focal length. I went with Tamron 28-75 2.8 for extra brightness, weight (old timer), and filters don't cost a car payment. Love it after hundreds of mostly indoor flash shots. Close up isn't too bad either. Color is great.
Tumak is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:48 PM.