Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 4, 2005, 7:38 PM   #21
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 175
Default

I second the Lowepro mini trekker. I like the classic version better than the AW version. It doesn't have the "rain cover", but looks much less like a camera backpack than anything else on the market (A good thing IMO)...

I also have Tamrac Velocity (I buy almost as many bags as my wife...), and I love the sling design, but it can't carry much stuff. It is the bag I use for airshows or zoos, etc, when I only take 1 or 2 lenses.

Chris M
www.imagineimagery.com
ChrisDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 5, 2005, 12:34 PM   #22
Junior Member
 
rainliu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 3
Default

i thing the 70-200L/f4 is the better one than anther one.

'L' means the professional lenses of canon , it has thebetterquality of pic.
rainliu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 23, 2005, 8:42 PM   #23
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7
Default

look closely at the sigma 70 to 200 f2.8 hsm lens

as i have stated before in these forums you would have to break my arms to get it off me :blah:
amarko5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2005, 9:41 PM   #24
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 8
Default

Slight update.

A friend from work bought a lesser Canon lens for her husband from Ritz Camera. She brought it over to show it off and I offered to give her $30 for a copy of her receipt and the box.

She accepted, so now my $100 20D rebate is doubled and her $15 becomes $30. The best part is she didn't know there even was a rebate available. So we both ended up winning.

Now, due to the advice on this board, I'm going to get a Sigma 70-200 f2.8 hsm dg and a 580ex with the money I didn't spend on 2.8 L glass.

You guys rock.
Fubar411 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2005, 9:46 PM   #25
Senior Member
 
matthew2000tx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,451
Default

why not a wider zoom?? 28-135mm IS???
matthew2000tx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 30, 2005, 1:24 AM   #26
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 92
Default

Don't overlook the new 70300IS. It's really a cracker: http://www.pbase.com/fstopjojo/70300s
fstopjojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2006, 12:44 AM   #27
Senior Member
 
Trique Daddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 282
Default

I recieved the Naneu Pro 110 SLRbackpack for Christmas. We found it at a local shopfor Under $80. It is very well constructed and will carry a lot of gear.It is worth consideration.

Trique Daddi



http://www.naneupro.com/
Trique Daddi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 2, 2006, 5:39 AM   #28
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 17
Default

just about a year ago I was in the same spot... I didn't fool around, didn't want to buy my lenses more than once.* Bought the 70-200 f2.8L IS USM.* I use it with 20D.* I put my money in the lenses instead of the camera... can upgrade the camera later on... but 20D is performing exceptionally... no complaints.* *I absolutely love this lense, I am SO glad I didn't mess around and waste money on a different one.* I shoot equine photography and it has been exactly what I needed, and it seems to perform very well with my camera.* happy happy happy.**[img]/forums/images/emoticons/laughing-smiley-002.gif[/img]Can't go wrong with this lense if you can manage to get a hold of one.*
Rico1Bad is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:18 AM.