Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital SLR and Interchangeable Lens Cameras > Canon Lenses

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 30, 2006, 9:11 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Default

Help in buy my first lens



Hi Guys,

I just got my Rebel Xt -350D, It was a gift

So it came with no lens..

I need to get lens for it.

I need a lens for everyday stuff, pics of family outdoors and indoor @ night

And @ parties. I also like to take macro shots of my Fish tank.



Please help decide on 1 lens to best fit my needs.



I don't have much exp with DSLRs, I have always used point&shoot cameras.





Thanks

For you help..
kamla is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 30, 2006, 9:58 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,105
Default

start with the 17-85. It covers almost a very good range. It has IS too.



If u think the lens is slow, try the 17-70 from Sigma. BUt it doesnt have IS.



Buy a 50mm f1.8 for shots at night.



Macro- a dedicated lens for macro is always better.



me
nymphetamine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2006, 10:54 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Default

SO the canon 17-85 is the best lens for me right now???

till i learn how to take better pics..

will the 17-85, take o.k pics 2 night..



Plus i have read up about the

Sigma Zoom Super Wide Angle 18-50mm f/2.8 EX DC Autofocus Lens for Canon Digital EOS
which is better the canon 17-85 or sigma 18-50...

or will i even know the difference 2 my level of exp??



Thanks

For your help

kamla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 30, 2006, 5:46 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
BoYFrMSpC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 339
Default

You may not be familiar with aperture since you're new to dSLRS. It's the number right next to the "f/" (i.e. f/2.8 , f/4.5). This is how much light can get through a lens in a certain amount of time - a high value is good for low light action. The lower the f/ number, the larger the apeture (It's a ratio).

The sigma 18-50 is f/2.8 but the 17-85 has IS. It's a trade-off: a large aperture ("fast") lens with a shorter focal length versus a low aperture ("slow") lens with a longer focal length and antishake technology. I think they're optically similiar. You can't really go wrong with either choice.
BoYFrMSpC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 11, 2006, 3:55 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
hercules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sparta, Greece
Posts: 2,649
Default

I also am trying to decide on two lenses 1 is 17-85 USM IS, and the othersigma 17-70 DC macrobut on all the reviews they say the sigma is better this is where i'm stuck now.
hercules is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 AM.