Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Canon

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 17, 2005, 3:19 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 579
Default

This is my fourth post about the use of Nikon lenses on A95. This post will use two Nikon two gems: TC-E2 2X and TC-E3ED teleconverters, although they are yet to be discussed in a later post. For specifications of these two, see my Coolpix 4500 user guide. Here is a list of previous posts:

(1) Adapter Tubes: http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=50412&forum_id=15

(2) Fisheye lenses:http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=50422&forum_id=15

(3) Close-Up Lenses (not necessarily Nikon): http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=50730&forum_id=15

This one is about lens reversal, a very popular close-up technique in the good old days. This fact can be proved easily (if you know a little optics): if a lens of focal length X (in mm) is reversely mounted on a lens (on camera) of focal length Y, the combo will have a magnification of Y/X. Thus, if a 50mm (resp., 25mm) lens is reversely mounted on a 200mm (on camera) lens, the combo will yield a magnification of 4X = 200/50 (resp., 8X = 200/25). This is the easiest way to increase magnification.

Unfortunately, small sensor digicams usually cannot take advantage of this technique. For example, the Canon A95 has a focal range of 7.8mm and 23.4mm. If a 50mm lens is reversely mounted on a A95 with the lens set to the wide angle 7.8mm (resp., telephoto 23.4mm), the magnification is 0.156X = 7.8/50 (resp., 0.468X = 23.4/50). This is not very impressive compared with what we learned in the previous close-up post. To increase the magnification, one must increase the focal length of the camera lens. For example, if a 2X (resp., 3X) telephoto converter is added to an A95, the longest focal length becomes 46.8mm (resp., 70.2mm), and the magnification will be 0.936X (resp., 1.4X). Normally, we would not be able to get exactly as the calculation tells because of many parameters (e.g., the gap between the camera lens and the reversed lens). Therefore, this installment tries to collect some data for the lens reversal technique for the A95.

WHAT ARE NEEDED?

The first and most important item is a good 35mm SLR lens. Normally, 45mm to 60mm and large aperture f/1.4 to f/2 would be sufficient. Lenses that are flat field are even better. Large aperture is important because the lens is usually used wide open to avoid vignetting. In this installment, a Minolta MD 50mm f/1.4 is used to take example images. Since the diopter of a lens is 1000/(focal length), mounting a 50mm lens in front of the camera lens is equivalent to the use of a +20 = 1000/50 close-up lens!

We also need a macro coupler and a few step rings. A macro coupler is a ring with male threads, and a step ring has one male thread and one female thread. Since the Minolta MD 50mm f/1.4 has a 49mm thread, and the Canon LA-DC52D has a 52mm thread, a 49-52mm macro coupler is required. The image below shows a Canon adapter tube, a 49-52mm macro coupler and a Minolta MD 50mm f/1.4 SLR lens.



Screw the 49mm end of the macro coupler to the Minolta lens and the 52mm end to the Canon adapter tube, and we have the following combo:



This is the combo on a A95:



HOW TO USE THIS COMBO?

The reversed lens is usually set to infinite focus because this setting usually yields the best results, and focusing with the reversed lens is not needed. Note that non-macro lenses are calibrated at infinite focus, and image quality gets worse in close range. The aperture is wide open as mentioned earlier. Since depth of field is very shallow, smaller camera aperture should be used. The minimum focusing distance is approximately the focal length of the reversed lens, and the combo usually cannot focus at infinity. In other words, this combo can only be used in close range! Moreover, the camera lens should be zoomed all the way for maximum magnification and avoiding vignetting.

MAGNIFICATION

For the sake of convenience, the following images are taken from the third installment. They were taken with A95 at the wide angle, Hoya +10 close-up lens, and Raynox MSN-500:

A95 at wide angle (0.13X):



A95 and Hoya +10 (0.24X)



A95 and Raynox MSN-500 (0.76X):



The image below was taken with A95 and a reversed Minolta 50mm f/1.4. The minimum focusing distance is about 1.25 in. The recorded length is 13mm and, consequently, this Minolta combo has a magnification of 0.41X, very close to the theoretical value. This is an expected result, because the Minolta lens is a +20 diopter close-up lens! Although it is not easy to see the quality difference between this and that of the Hoya, the 100% crops show that the reversed Minolta has a much better quality. Compared with the Raynox MSN-500's result, this Minolta still wins since the edge portion of the Raynox image is soft and less contrasty; however, this comparison is not entirely fair because the Raynox has a higher magnification.

A95 and Minolta 50mm reversed (0.41X)



It is interesting to point out that from the magnification value one can compute the diopter of a close-up lens. For example, the Raynox MSN-500 has magnification 0.76X at A95's maximum focal length 23.4mm. Since (focal length of A95)/(focal length of Raynox) = 0.76, we have (focal length of Raynox) = 23.4/0.76 = 30.8mm and the diopter of the Raynox is approximately +32.5 = 1000/30.8.

HIGHER MAGNIFICATION

Reversing a Minolta 50mm f/1.4 only yields a magnification of 0.41X. Can we obtain a higher magnification, say 1:1 life-size? We have two options: (1) increase the focal length of the camera lens, and/or (2) decrease the focal length of the reversed lens. Option (2) is a little difficult to achieve because reducing the focal length of a reversely mounted lens could cause vignetting. Thus, it is very likely that Option (1) is the only alternative. The easiest way to increase the focal length of the camera lens is adding a good teleconverter. Otherwise, chromatic aberration, soft corners and lower contrast can easily be seen from a poor teleconverter. Fortunately, Nikon have two very good teleconverters: the TC-E2 2X and TC-E3ED 3X. They are the best 2X and 3X teleconverters on the market for small size cameras.

Since the TC-E2 has a 62mm front thread and a 28mm rear thread, a 37-28 thread converter is required to use it with the LensMate 37mm adapter tune. Moreover, we also need to go down from 62mm to 49mm. The image below shows a TC-E2 (left), a Minolta 50mm f/1.4 (right), a 62-52mm step-down ring, and a 52-49mm macro coupler.


This is the result of mounting the Minolta 50mm reversely on to the TC-E2:


And, the following shows this TC-E2 plus Minolta 50mm combo on an A95:


Finally, the image below is the actual shot. The vertical coverage is about 7mm, and the actual magnification is 0.76X = 5.319/7, which is equal to that of the Raynox MSN-500. Note that the focal length of the A95 plus TC-E2 is 46.8mm = 23.4 x 2, and the theoretical magnification is 0.936X = 46.8/50! This discrepancy may be due to the space between the reversed lens and the Minolta, and the less power of TC-E2 when focused at close range. Virtually all lens characteristics are calibrated at infinity, and you might not see full power (i.e., 2X of a 2X telephoto converter) at close range. Comparing this and the result of the Raynox MSN-500, this lens reversal result is sharper in both center and edge, although more testing would be required to make a definitive answer.



The TC-E3ED has a 72mm front thread and a 28mm rear thread, a 37-28mm thread converter is also required to use it with the LensMate 37mm adapter tune. Moreover, we also need to go down from 72mm to 49mm. The image below shows a TC-E3ED (left), a Minolta 50mm f/1.4 (right), a 72-62mm and a 62-52mm step-down rings, and a 52-49mm macro coupler.


The following image shows the TC-E3ED on a Minolta 50mm. Please notice two important facts. First, the TC-E3ED front element is very large while that of the Minolta 50mm is relatively small. As a result, the TC-E3ED may see a portion of the Minolta's lens barrel, causing vignetting. Second, the gap between the front lens elements of the TC-E3ED and Minolta is larger than that of the TC-E2 case. This means the Minolta 50mm is pushed away from the TC-E3ED, another possibility of vignetting.


The image below shows this big combo on an A95.


Finally, this is the actual shot. It has vignetting as we mentioned earlier. The recorded vertical length is 5mm, making the magnification slightly higher than life-size: 1.06X = 5.319/5, although the theoretical magnification is 1.4X = (3*23.4)/50. The center sharpness is very good, although the corners are a bit soft. If cropping is acceptable in your work, this TC-E3ED plus Minolta 50mm combo may be an easy way for 1:1 life size macro photography. We certainly can replace the TC-E3ED with cheaper 3X converters; however, optical quality could be compromised. A not-so-good 3X teleconverter can generate a significant amount of chromatic aberration.


The following table summarizes all findings in this and the previous close-up post. And, this concludes my close-up related posts.



CK
http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/DigiCam
Nikon Coolpix 950/990/995/2500/4500/5700 and Panasonic FZ-10 User Guides





shene is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 18, 2005, 4:18 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 28
Default

how much would all these goodies run for? Awesome write up btw...
longn614 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2005, 7:59 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 579
Default

longn614 wrote:
Quote:
how much would all these goodies run for? Awesome write up btw...
Nikon TC-E2 $124.95 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...060&is=REG

Nikon TC-E3ED $209.95 http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...719&is=REG

50mm f/1.4 SLR lens: any brand OK. Available on eBay usually around $50, depending on condition. AF is not needed.

Macro coupler: usually around $8 to $10 per copy http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/cont...Q=&ci=3066

Step rings cost similarly.

CK


shene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 18, 2005, 9:14 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5
Default

Excellent posts! Just what us A95 folks need. You may be just the guy to answer my question. Just this morning I E-Mailed Lensmateonline and asked them about their 37 mm adapter for the A95 and how that would work with the Nikon TC-E2. They answered quickly but told me they didn't know anything about it...I've read that those two in combo with a spacer works perfectly on an A80 to give you 5 non-vignetting focal length stops as opposed to the 2 with the Canon 1.75x adapter. I was wondering if you have any info on this? Do I need a spacer or just a step down ring to get the proper distance between the Nikon lens and the camera? Do you know how to get the best performace in this combo?



Any help would be much appreciated.

Thanks,

James
JamesRW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2005, 3:25 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 579
Default

JamesRW wrote:
Quote:
Do I need a spacer or just a step down ring to get the proper distance between the Nikon lens and the camera? Do you know how to get the best performace in this combo?
I have no hard evidence to prove or disprove if the spacer is absolutely necessary for the Nikon TC-E2 and TC-E3ED because it will require an extensive and thorough testing. I did not use that spacer for all of my testing so far and did not find any problem. When I get to the telephoto section, I will spend sometime to look into this issue. If you do like the TC-E2 or TC-E3ED, you may simply go ahead and use it without a spacer. In addition to Photosolve's 37-28mm thread converter, KALT has a 37-28mm step-down ring. Unlike the Photosolve thread converter, this KALT step-down ring is a thick one, perhaps has 2mm to 3mm, which may serve as a shorter spacer and a thread converter. KALT's ring should be available at your local shop or from B&H.

CK

http://www.cs.mtu.edu/~shene/DigiCam

Nikon Coolpix 950/990/995/2500/4500/5700 and Panasonic FZ-10 User Guides




shene is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 20, 2005, 3:54 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 5
Default

Thanks very much. I bought a TC-E2 on EBay already, and I see what you mean by the Kalt, there is a pretty good picture of it at B&H. I'll order a 37 mm adapter from LensMate. I have read many reports of this one being of better quality and fit than the Canon adapter so I don't think I can go wrong there. Now I'll hit a couple of camera stores and see what I can come up with for a step down ring.

Can't wait for your telephoto section, thanks for all your ideas andtesting on this camera. I love mine.

James
JamesRW is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:46 AM.