|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Mar 12, 2009, 6:32 AM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 222
|
[align=center]
 [/align][align=center]  [/align][align=center]  [/align][align=center]again, the detail at marco is not working as expected or desired[/align] [align=center]"p&s limited"[/align] [align=center]  [/align]
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
Mar 13, 2009, 3:46 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Miami Valley, OH
Posts: 154
|
Are you using a tripod? It's nearly impossible to get sharp macros hand-held.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3, 2009, 12:56 AM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 222
|
i'm sorry for the late reply.
i currently, don't own a tripod. one is one my list of new items w/ a dslr. [i am still undecided, there] my photos are hand held [except a rare night shot, but even then i'll hand hold -why? i dont now-just for the practice?] & i usually only post those i am somewhat happy with. today is an exception: if the subject is real small, such as teeny-tiny,pinhead sized bubbles [today] then i run into problems, with the camera i am using at this time. [p&s sony w55]  larger image:http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/3408030749/sizes/o/  larger image: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/3408030763/sizes/o/  ""http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/3408838352/sizes/o/ so it tried settingi set the the camera on top of the glass and shoot into the scene. the bubbles aren't as close as I'd like them. B/W wasn't any better   larger here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/3408030811/sizes/o/ |
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:19 AM.
