Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 31, 2006, 12:23 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,214
Default

It seems that 105 comes out better than 28-200 in quality; howeve, from avalue for money point of view, 28-200 has beengood enough.

Photo 1 wastaken with Nikon gears all the wayfrom the camera body, the lens to the flash unit while 2 withDimage A2 and its tailor-madeflash unit3600HS(D).

The following one is Photo 1.
Attached Images
 
wk7leung is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 31, 2006, 12:24 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,214
Default

Photo 2
Attached Images
 
wk7leung is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 AM.