|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia, New South Wales central coast
Posts: 3,645
|
![]()
G'day Simon
Thank you for adding your 2-bob's worth Like you with The lens I found was one of the 200's strong points... not least being able to zip out to wide angle at the flick of a wrist... I also find the versatility of the lens / camera combo to be 'amazing' While the advantages [along with the expense] of a superb brand-name lens are always evident, my experience is that our superzoom lenses can produce a pretty good image for a fraction of the expense ~ and sometimes it would be nice for the media to acknowledge this without poo-pooing all superzoom cameras as 'rubbish' Phil
__________________
Has Lumix mirrorless & superzoom cameras and loves their amazing capabilities Spends 8-9 months each year travelling Australia Recent images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bangor,North Wales
Posts: 3,766
|
![]()
bernabeu- going to an X10 isn't a "down"... it's a change of direction...
![]() Nice little camera- and I'd like one myself... or maybe the X20... ![]() Indeed Ozzie... to label a superzoom/bridge as "rubbish" is nonsense. In the right hands they can produce thoroughly decent images. I could go into the many "pros" of such a camera- but we've done that before... several times... ![]() Last edited by SIMON40; Jan 23, 2014 at 4:10 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
x10 (fixed lens 'minizoom') - minipod - cable release - looking up - 23mm equiv - aspect corrected with DIP9 - iso 200 - P mode
subject approx. 36" high the modern consumer zooms are real close to typical 'pro' glass (except maybe Hassy or Zeitz) Last edited by bernabeu; Jun 27, 2015 at 5:25 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|