Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digital Cameras (Point and Shoot) > Fujifilm

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 14, 2005, 10:12 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,063
Default


jphess is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Sep 14, 2005, 11:29 AM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 24
Default

Oh my goodness! That's so cool! I'm studying astronomy right now with my dd, and that would be so much fun to do together! Now if only I could decide which camera... Thinking the S9000, if it would hurry up and get out here in the US.

Elizabeth
MyOnly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2005, 6:31 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
shadowlies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 251
Default

jphess wrote:
Quote:
I don't know, maybe I'm becoming a little too tolerant of my own photographic efforts. But I thought this was a pretty good image from my Fuji S5100.

http://www.stevesforums.com/forums/v...amp;forum_id=8

Hi jphess,

Could you enlighten me as to how you took the moon pic, as I would like to give it a try. BTW, great shot!
shadowlies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 14, 2005, 11:57 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,063
Default


jphess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2005, 4:20 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
shadowlies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 251
Default

Thanks jphess, that will be enough for me to give it a try. Too much info would either make it too confusing or too easy that there would be no sense of accomplishment.

Just need a tripod and I am set, oh and a RAW convert that I can use. Oh and learn more about post production. To date I have played around with pics but only vary basic things. eg: unsharpen mask, filter adjustments (warm/cool) and cropping. I look forward to experimenting with layers etc.

But never fear, if I do run into to trouble I will be posing a few more questions.
shadowlies is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2005, 9:35 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,063
Default


jphess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2005, 1:57 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Monza76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,093
Default

jphess

Just a suggestion, but how about taking a day and planning on getting everything right! What I mean is to get away from the Photoshop dependency by trying to shoot everything with the plan of no post-processing. Shoot jpeg fine, focus carefully, adjust your white balance properly for each change of lighting, adjust your exposures carefully (bracketting is OK), use a tripod where ever possible, and set your camera for the most pleasant sharpness and saturation settings. Take the best images straight from the camera and print them without any further adjustment (besides cropping).

I also find that I am a little caught up with PS, I want to get back to making prints with less adjustment.

Ira
Monza76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2005, 2:19 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,063
Default


jphess is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2005, 9:19 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
CCWKen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 221
Default

CP or not, the 5, 7 and 9000 series cameras are a lot to handle. It's nice to have the options but few breaking intophotography (and manyold hands)fully understandwhen orhow to use the options. They tend to rely on hours of post processing to make a good shot. If they're not doing that, they're shooting full auto. I would be willing to bet that more than 80% of most photos are shot in auto or AP. Mostly because the cameras are better.

I've noticed that every 28 days there's a "new" batch of moon shots. I'm not impressed by any of them. It seems every newbie has to have a shot of the moon. They post the pic here and expect a good review. For me to be impressed with a moon shot, the photographer will have more equipment than a tripod and digital camera. Not to deminish the value of your shot but the moon is poorly captured in most pictures I see and need far too much post processing.

If your basing your requirement on size and ease of use, there's better options available than Fuji's EVF's.

Ken
CCWKen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 15, 2005, 11:53 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,063
Default

CCWKen,

Thank you for your carefully thought out and well stated comments. I didn't realize how far out of line I was, and how ill informed I am, and how inappropriate my comments have been. I have removed my comments and the pictures, and will not trouble you or any of the other contributors anymore.

Best regards,
Jim
jphess is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:22 AM.