Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 19, 2006, 10:43 PM   #1
Senior Member
Contriver's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 268

I am looking at purchasing a cheap video camera so that I can record things like my son's games and school events. I don't need super video quality, just something to be able to watch again in the future. I was wondering how well the H2 and S3 compare to thevideo of a real video camera since if it where comparable, I think I would opt for the H2 or S3 instead of the real video camera. I know one big distinction is that I am limited on storage with the digicams, but what are some other considerations? I am guessing that battery life may be one as well. I assume that even if I have a 2 GB card and am able to shoot 25-30 minutes of video, the batteries might have other plans. Anyway, what do you all think?
Contriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 20, 2006, 11:24 AM   #2
Senior Member
kassandro's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 448

With an S3 is you can get only 16-18 minutes out of one 2 GB card, but the image quality is truely excellent. It competes quite well with a real comcorder. You can then recompress such videos on a PC down to 200-250 MB with almost no quality loss. With the Sony H2 you can put significantly more minutes on a 2 GB card, but the quality is also significantly lower. Also a 2 GB memory stick for the H2 costs significantly more than a 2 GB SD card for the S3.
kassandro is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:12 AM.