|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 268
|
![]()
I am considering buying the K100D (still LOL) and I have some questions I haven't yet been able to answer:
1) My existing camera is a Canon A520. Its aperature can be widened to f2.6. The kit lens for the K100D only opens to f3.5. Obviously the K100D has a much more sensitive sensor and I would assume even at f3.5 on it, it should be able to absorb more light than the Canon A520 at f2.6. Is this correct or not? 2) Do you think is an ok idea to start off with the kit lens and learn where I want to go from there? Or, would I be better off just buying the body and getting a lens that offers slightly more range? |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hay River Township, WI
Posts: 2,512
|
![]()
Contriver wrote:
Quote:
Contriver wrote: Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
![]()
Contriver wrote:
Quote:
The lens on your PowerShot A520 is a 5.8-23.2mm zoom, with a maximum aperature of f/2.6 at 5.8mm. That is a pretty short focal length, but it works on the A520 because the camera only has a 10mm image sensor. The kit lens on the Pentax K100D is an 18-55mm lens with an maximum aperature of f/3.5 at 18mm. That's a longer focal length, but that's what's needed for the K100D because the camera has a 23.5mm image sensor. The f number is the ratio of the diameter of the objective lens to its focal length, and does not vary with the size of the image sensor. At its maximum aperature, the lens on the A520 admits more than twice as much light to its 10mm image sensor as the kit lens on the K100D admits to its 23.5mm image sensor. But because the focal length of 5.8mm is so small, it's not that tough to make a lens bright enough to do that. Pentax makes brighter lenses than the 18-55mm f/3.5, but they cost more than its $199 list price. For instance, Pentax has a 50mm f/1.4 lens that costs $299, but it doesn't zoom. So, longer lenses cost more, brighter lenses cost more, and longer brighter lenses cost A LOT more. Contriver wrote: Quote:
And if not, there are lots of other lenses for the K100D. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 268
|
![]()
Thanks for the info guys!
I don't find myself zooming in on things very often with my A520. Typically, I like to shoot the local outdoors scenary including a park that has alot of waterfalls (which tends to be dark most of the time due to dense forest in those parts); I like to experiment with night photography (illuminated bridges; populated valleys with artificial light); I like to do some somewhat close up stuff; and then theres just random stuff in between. BTW, I just realized that the K100D only goes down to an ISO of 200. Is there any reason for this? Also, as far as lenses go, do you get the most bang for the buck with Pentax? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 268
|
![]()
BillDrew, is this an example of the 50mm lens you are talking about?
http://cgi.ebay.com/SMC-Pentax-M-50m...QQcmdZViewItem |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 879
|
![]()
Contriver wrote:
Quote:
It's nothing to really be concerned about. If they tacked on an ISO 100 to the K100d it really wouldn't be very useful since the images are so clean at 200 already. In my opinion, the K100d's greatest strength is probably it's performance at ISO 800. Most digicams at ISO 100 wish they could look as good as the K100d does at 800. On your lens question, that depends on whether or not you intend to use older manual focus lenses. The Pentax can use just about any lens built for Pentax in the past 4 decades, but of course the older ones aren't very feature rich. I got myself a decent collection of lenses, including a 50mm f/1.7 A, 50mm f/1.4 screw mount, screw mount adapter, 135mm f/2.5 M, 80-200mm f/4 M, 28mm f/2.8 and a 2x macro teleconverter for about $170. I ended up with a couple old film cameras, some UV filters and a decent external flash in the process. There are a lot of used automatic lenses available as well, but they've gone up in value a lot recently, probably due to the popularity of the K100d and the K10. If you're more interested in fully automatic lenses, I believe Nikon offers the highest quality glass for cheap. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 268
|
![]()
When you mention Nikon, are you also including the D40? I understand that it only accepts a limited range of lenses. I do like the small size of the D40 however.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 879
|
![]()
I haven't personally looked at the lens selection for the Nikons so I can't really say. If the lenses that are available look like they'd cover your needs, and if you like the Nikon camera, then I'd say it's a good starter camera. The selection will likely expand over time, and since you'd be investing in the Nikon system, it's likely that your next camera would also be a Nikon but without the limitations.
If it were me though, and it was my first DSLR, I'd be a bit concerned that I wouldn't really know what it was I might need in the future and end up discovering that a lens I'd really want to use isn't available, and then I'd be stuck having to do without or buying another camera too soon. I wish I could give you more specific advice, but being as I'm pretty happy with my $170 selection of manual focus lenses and a kit lens (and probably a cheap 75-300 AF lens in the future), every other lens system looks like a ripoff for my own photography. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
![]()
Pentax makes very good lenses.
That said, there are four companies that make the best lenses in the world. They are Canon, Nikon, Zeiss, and Leica. Canon lenses are for Canon dSLRs, Nikon lenses are for Nikon and Fuji dSLRs, Zeiss lenses are for Sony dSLRs, and Leica lenses are for Panasonic and Leica dSLRs. And Canon and Nikon have the broadest selection of lenses. Because of this, there are more Canon and Nikon dSLRs out there than other brands. And because of this, third party lens manufacturers (Sigma, Tamron, etc.) make more lenses, and retailers carry more lensesfor Canon and Nikon dSLRs that for other brands. But, as with any otherchoice you willever have tomake,if you are comfortable with the features and the limitations of the K100D, then go with it. As to the Nikon D40, it doesn't have its own motor for focusing lenses, so it will only be able to autofocus lenses that have their own motors. That places a limit on the choice of lenses available to you, but that choice is still quite good. When you buy a dSLR, you're buying more than just a camera. You're buying the foundation of what could become a very large system. How big a system you think you might ever need is the decision you must make. Though it may appear otherwise, I did not intend this to be an endorsement of one particular brand over another. I think the Pentax K100D is a fine camera. I think there are a lot of fine cameras. The brand of camera I own hasn't even been mentioned in this topic. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|