Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 16, 2006, 9:22 PM   #41
JimC's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Savannah, GA (USA)
Posts: 22,378

BowerR64 wrote:
The MX1200 has a little sensor on the front that meters the light the A120 doesnt have anything so i think it does it a little differnt.
It's probably for measuring reflected light during a flash exposure.

Non-DSLR models normally use the camera's main sensor (the same one providing you a live feed to the LCD and the same one capturing the final image) to meter the scene.

When you see a separate sensor on the front of a digital camera, it's normally used to measure reflected light during a flash exposure. A separate sensor is better because the main sensors used in digital cameras are too reflective to meter from during a flash exposure like film cameras could do with off the film metering.

Most digital cameras don't work that way for flash exposure, though. Instead, they use a very short preflash to help gauge the length of the main flash needed. It's so short, most users don't even notice it. This is not the same thing as a preflash for redeye reduction or autofocus assist purposes, it's a metering preflash.

It sounds like the MX1200 probably doesn't need a metering preflash (thanks to a separate sensor). But, that shouldn't have anything to do with the metering differences you see for non-Flash photos. It's probably using the camera's main CCD sensor for that.

Each camera is going to behave a bit differently. You'll have metering algorithm differences, tone curve differences, etc., even when using models that that let you make identical settings for ISO Speed, Aperture and Shutter Speed.

A lot of parameters impact image processing.

JimC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 16, 2006, 10:31 PM   #42
Senior Member
BowerR64's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 142

See i asked for a new digital camera for christmas and my dad got me this POS from heartland america it was a quickclix 3185. It was a total POS but i thought it had a problem because the pictures were so bad then i took some outside and they didnt look to bad. I sent it back and they sent me this fujifilm. It took like 2 months or so to get it in the mean time i was buying used broken cameras off e-bay and fixing them up. By the time i got this fujifilm i already had about 6 good ones, or atleast better then what i got.

These are the images that quickclicx took.

The V1 and the canons are good.
BowerR64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 24, 2006, 5:04 AM   #43
Senior Member
geriatric's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 326

I cannot remember where I copied this from
Attached Images
geriatric is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:06 AM.