Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 18, 2010, 12:59 PM   #1
Junior Member
Kevin Childress's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11
Default 4:3 ratio versus 16:9

What are your thoughts on photos taken at 4:3 ratio versus 16:9? What does one stand to loose or gain either way? Does either ratio benefit one's ability to control depth-of-field or exposure compensation, etc?

I always leave my camera set at 10 MP / 4:3 ratio. If I want 16:9, I have to drop resolution to 7.5 MP. Have I been missing an opportunity by not alternating between these ratios?

Any other thoughts you have are appreciated!

Kevin Childress
Kevin Childress is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jan 18, 2010, 3:04 PM   #2
Senior Member
mtngal's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,177

I've seen pleasing pictures in both formats. The one thing I suspect is that the 16:9 format is taking the 10 mp picture and cutting some of it off to give you the aspect ratio. That being the case, you could do that yourself using software, and have the option to crop the way YOU want to. Shooting at 16:9 would be nice if you are going to use your pictures only as a slide show on a wide-screen TV and not do any editing.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 19, 2010, 4:19 AM   #3
Senior Member
kazuya's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,009

i think it all depends on the subject, some landscapes can benefit greatly from 16:9
but studio & portrait work probably not
kazuya is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 2:00 AM.