Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 30, 2003, 2:01 PM   #11
Junior Member
V7iktor's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5

Is the whole thread about the proportions of the CCD sensor?
Sorry for such a newbe question
Is this why Olympus C5050 can only shoot 4/3 format pictures (and a little wider but nowhere near classic pictures)?
Anyway I think 4/3 is the best ratio for viewing your pictures on computer screen (which is 4/3 usually for most resolutions), so if you don't print your pictures that would be a better choice right? (Full screen with no black edges looks really nice)
V7iktor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 30, 2003, 2:17 PM   #12
Senior Member
voxmagna's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,162

But, if you were sat in front of your TV for 'lean back' viewing pleasure, or in the cinema, you'd appreciate a wider picture. Instead, your eye's are being pulled in to the shape of a pc screen for a lean forward experience, which is not the way scenes naturally appear.

If we were conditioned to round PC screens or a flat Earth, we would think that was fine until we'd experienced something else.
voxmagna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2003, 6:06 AM   #13
Junior Member
V7iktor's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5

Hehe true, but you gotta face the reality: wide CRTs (and LCD panels) are the expensive ones, and there aren't many of such

Myself I really like viewing photos on the monitor, my parents say it's like watching slides (with a projector). But the quality is awesome, and you don't need that high of resolution: 1280x960 is already higher than my desktop: which is 1152x864.

In my case printing photos isn't going to happen: I like the "image of light" much more: colors, contrast and SIZE. And then imagine a pc projector wow (and they are also 4/3).
If I want to show pictures to someone else: I can take the laptop with me...

I don't know but 4/3 isn't going away in the pc world, not yet.

Oh and I forgot: my point. Well, my point is that full screen makes all the difference: even 3/2 with thin black areas at the top and bottom, doesn't look right. You get the feeling that you're missing detail because the image has to be resized. That's why 4/3 cameras are better suited for PC viewing of photos.
V7iktor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2003, 7:30 AM   #14
Senior Member
NHL's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,599

... I think we're getting OT here!

While 4/3 is the proportion of most CCDs with its video/monitor sized origin, it's not what this thread is about. I believe the discussion was about the pro and con of the Oly/Kodak 4/3 system as it pertains to the image circle! ie its diagonal is exactly 1/2 of the 24x36mm diagonal picture frame of competing dSLRs, with its corresponding smaller lenses and mirror box (or smaller lens / regular mirror box in case of DX lenses)!

The 3/2 aspect ratio of other dSLRs is not a factor here and is already discussed in other threads... :P
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:49 AM.