|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1
|
![]()
Hi, I'm using Konica Minolta Dynax 5D at the moment, i mainly use the kit lens (18-70).
I'm thinking about buying the Carl Zeiss 16-80. I also consider buying new camera with the prices below $1000. Which one would give me the best outcome? Thanks ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
![]()
The Sony/Zeiss 16-80 is a fine lens. Another alternative is the Tamron 17-50/2.8. Do you find that you use the wide end of your 18-70 most often, or the long end? Do you shoot mostly outdoors or indoors?
The best choice for a body right now is the Sony A580, though you may want to look at the A55 or the A35. Also, the A65 might work well for you, but it's not currently available in the USA.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,599
|
![]()
I think you should trade them both in on a new system. Things have moved on quite a bit.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bangor,North Wales
Posts: 3,766
|
![]()
Hi Topocalypse. You ask "which would give me the best outcome..?"
With regards what exactly...? Are you looking for a slightly wider/longer zoom or improved optical quality? Are you happy with the speed and image quality of the 5D... or not.? What are you looking to improve on...? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,309
|
![]()
My guess would be that the Zeiss lens would not give you much improvement in image quality on the 5D body - it would need a higher resolution body to be able to appreciate the improvement. A camera upgrade would probably give you the most 'bang for your buck' at this time, and be able to take better advantage of lens upgrades in the future.
brian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
![]()
I'd say that the 5D would hold back any really good lens, and that the 18-70 would hold back any really good camera.
But I was always pleased with the Tamron 17-50/2.8 on my 5D, so maybe going with the Zeiss now is a good way to spread out the cost. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Last edited by TCav; Oct 30, 2011 at 2:12 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|