|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 27
|
![]()
Anti shake is like a counter balance it works in opposite motion of the object in question to counter out the involuntary motion.
but here's a link it might explain it better http://konicaminolta.com/products/co...age-a2/02.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 27
|
![]()
oops re-read your post ferny well here's a snippet taken from that link ^ I just posted
Anti-Shake offers unrivaled stability up to 3 shutter speeds slower than digital cameras without a stabilization system. What makes it so effective is its unique CCD-shift mechanism. The CCD sensor rests on a movable mount, which shifts according to the amount of camera shake detected by the camera's motion detectors. Shifting occurs along the x, y-axes to cancel out the effects of camera shake. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Toronto, ON, Canada
Posts: 1,707
|
![]()
Here's an animation of the IS technology on the Canon Pro90IS/Olympus C-2100UZ:
http://www.canon.com/technology/deta...ift/index.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 4,036
|
![]() Minolta uses a different system from Canon and Panasonic. Minolta stabilizes the CCD where Canon, Panasonic and the old Oly stabilize an element in the lens system. They both work about the same. I think the 3 f stops might be a little optimistic, but it is at least 2. The nice thing about the Minolta system is that they are going to be able to integrate it into their new DSLR so that all lenses will be stabilized. I don't think it makes any difference which system is used for a camera without interchangeable lenses. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,866
|
![]()
That's helpful. Thanks guys.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|