|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#71 | ||
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 652
|
![]()
Keoeeit wrote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 133
|
![]()
Keoeeit wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7
|
![]()
Keoeeit wrote:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#74 | ||||||||||
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 7
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,241
|
![]()
Keoeeit wrote:
Quote:
You are absolutely INCORRECT about it insulating and keeping heat inside. Black absorbs heat faster and it releases heat faster. Now to the sensor temperature part. What sensor is going to be warmer. A DSLR sensor thatis in stand-by mode until the fraction of a second the exposure requires of it, or the digicam which is functioning full time providing data for the EVF and a back-lit LCD. Olympus had to address this to try to get live view functional on their E410/E510 DSLR cameras. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529
|
![]()
tjsnaps wrote:
Quote:
As for optical viewfinders going away - we're a ways away from that. The current technology level isn't yet good enough to replace them - you don't have the quality yet and more important there is still latency. I think they'll get to the point where you have both. As for the last comment - it's unfortunate some people are like that. I agree DSLRs are not the right solution for everyone. But there are certain areas like low light, sports and wildlife where the difference is significant - especially in prints. The key is to match the camera to the original poster's needs. In a few instances, yes a DSLR is required to get quality results (on a large scale). But for the vast majority of camera buyers it absolutely isn't necessary. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#77 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 652
|
![]()
Well I just bought a used DSLR as my first digital (a D50) I was a little leary of buying used but I couldn't afford even a digicam new. And used the good digicams are going for more than the DSLR's I will regret not having a LCD to compose with (I use the waist level finder on my F quite a bit) But I did want the ability to achieve a shallow DOF and it would seem a shame to let all this glass I have sitting here go to waist.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1
|
![]()
s3 is black by the way
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 167
|
![]()
I am sorry to come in that heated debate.
I am just an amateur (not even a good one) who finds the photograph posted by John and Eric amazing and I must say of better quality than the P&S. Well, yes, that is a thing I think I do not too bad... enjoy over people's photos !! But that is not my point, I pick up athree sentences from Keoeeitwhich are not really aligned with the polite, nice atmosphere this forum has normally (I read it much more often than I post)... so Quote:
I selected the last quote because as a troll mechanical engineer I love what is mechanical. It is robust, safe, reliable and can be repaired with a bit of good will. EDIT : it seems I missed a few posts when I wrote this, but I don't think it changes anything to what I wanted to say. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Savannah, GA (USA)
Posts: 22,378
|
![]()
What an interesting thread. Some of the posts would make good examples of how not to behave in public forums.
If you have an opposing point of view, debate the merits of your point of view, without resorting to name calling and personal attacks. Otherwise, don't post here at all. Let's keep the discussion civil. Jim C. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|