|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 2,093
|
![]() Quote:
If you can't find a plane of focus I'd suspect the lens was stopped down quite a ways. A. C. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 14
|
![]()
Is the Canon SX30IS more likely to be able to produce a shallower depth of field than the Canon SX130IS? Or is it about the same?
Thanks. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 2,093
|
![]()
For most photographic purposes in the range where both camera have the same focal length they will have the essentially the same DoF. The SX30IS has much longer focal lengths available and those longer focal lengths can, under some realist scenarios provide a very shallow DoF but whether or not you'd be able bring that to bear in the your photographic circumstances I can't predict.
To significantly change the DoF characteristic you'll need cameras with much larger sensors than 1/2.3 use in both the 30 or the 130. At least a 4:3 or m4:3 system. A. C. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|