|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#51 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,456
|
![]()
How about this one.... what is it doing to our DOF as all the shots are with the same camera http://blog.buiphotography.com/2009/...th-directions/
![]()
__________________
[SIZE=1][SIZE=2]Any problems with a post or thread please use the report button at the bottom left of the post and the team will help sort it out. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
![]()
That looks like HDR for DoF.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,599
|
![]()
Yeah, well you can do it handheld or use one of the motorized panoramic heads. Which seems more sensible to me. Sure as heck beats a scanning back, or even medium format digital.
Take a Sony A850 or Canon 5DMk2 with a motorized panoramic head and you are going to spend way less than MF digital, and end up with much higher resolution images. http://www.roundshot.ch/xml_1/intern.../d927/f850.cfm http://gigapansystems.com/gigapan-pr...duct-page.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
Super Moderator
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,456
|
![]() Quote:
![]()
__________________
[SIZE=1][SIZE=2]Any problems with a post or thread please use the report button at the bottom left of the post and the team will help sort it out. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
![]()
It's a composite image that has the same DoF as each of the component images.
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,309
|
![]()
In effect, using this method, you are changing the film format to something a lot larger, thereby reducing DOF for the image. (85mm at f/1/4 gives you a very different look on MF than on 35mm)
brian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | ||
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529
|
![]()
Another quote from you Brian:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,309
|
![]()
Sorry, but I don't see any inconsistencies. If I shoot x number of exposures at 300mm F/4, and stitch them together to get a FOV equivalent to a 50mm lens, the overall picture has the DOF of the 300mm lens, not changing the DOF, but if the overall shot is viewed as a 50mm, it will be reduced from what is expected of the 50. This is consistent with the DOF being fixed at the time the picture is taken. You increase the size of the 'film', even if it is done after the fact.
But I was talking about single exposres, anyway. brian |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
![]() Quote:
Suppose that each of the component images, from left to right in the composite image, were shot at progressively smaller apertures. In the author's example, for instance, the component images in the leftmost column might have been shot with an aperture of f/1.4, and the component images in each successive column would have been shot with an aperture 1/3 stop smaller. The subject would be captured with an aperture ranging from f/2.8 to f/3.5, and the rightmost column of component images would be shot with an aperture of f/6.3. The DoF would differ across the composite image, because the DoF varied from one component image to another. That can only be done at the time the shutter button is depressed (for each component image.) How could that be changed after the fact?
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|