|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Sep 4, 2006, 12:19 PM
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 820
|
Hey all, I was wondering what would happen if you took an SLR body with built in IS, and then attached a lens with in-lens IS... would you get super IS?
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
Sep 4, 2006, 12:30 PM
|
#2 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Nobody makes both....
|
|
|
|
Sep 4, 2006, 1:06 PM
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 820
|
Oh... so there's no lens combination that uses both, thats no fun... imagine being able to shoot at like 1/5th shutter speeds on telephoto lenses:?
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 4, 2006, 8:46 PM
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
|
My guess is that it would really mess things up.
Both systems would detect the same camera shake and both would try to correct it. The in-lens IS would undo the shake, producing a stable image on the sensor. The sensor would correct for the shake and really mess up the image, either producing blur or (if the shutter speed was high enough) part of the image circle would just not be on the sensor and the image would be clipped at least one side. But as Kalypso said, no ones makes both. Eric |
|
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2006, 12:08 AM
|
#5 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 21
|
Do nikon camera anti shake devise built in camera body or the lens?
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2006, 6:52 AM
|
#6 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 546
|
Morag2 wrote:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2006, 7:13 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Taylor Mill, Kentucky
Posts: 2,398
|
creationist wrote:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:46 AM.
