Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 2, 2005, 6:21 PM   #1
Senior Member
nymphetamine's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,105

How rugged is this AS in the KM series. Meaning, when compared to lenses how long do u think this AS in the body will last. And what could be the service and replacement charges. Doesnt it just add more liability to the camera now(tho the AS is the best a dSlr can ask for)..

I mean if u look at the downside, isnt it bigger than the other non AS cameras like Nikon , Canon and others.

I personaly beleive KM 5D or 7D can replace even 20D in most of the situations except may be shooting sports.But how reliable the AS are.

nymphetamine is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Nov 2, 2005, 6:36 PM   #2
Senior Member
terry@softreq.com's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,540

I don't think the antishake is a problem in terms of reliablity however I haven't heard of anyone talking about their antishake "breaking".

I think Nikons are considered the best "sports" cameras because of their ability to do 1/500th flash synchronization.

Canons are known for the best image quality.

Konica Minolta are known for the best user friendly controls.

I personally couldn't be bothered with antishake myself as it doesn't really fit my photographic style.

-- Terry

terry@softreq.com is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.